NooCube discloses more overall — based on ingredient quality, transparency, value, and trust signals.
Higher overall score
0.0
/10Insufficient Data
Minimal public information available to assess this product independently.
This score reflects disclosure completeness — not a verdict on product quality.
Scored: June 2026
Score breakdown by dimension
| ONNIT | Dimension | NooCube |
|---|---|---|
0.0 | Ingredient Quality35% | ▲0.8 |
0.0 | Transparency30% | 0.0 |
1.0 | Value20% | ▲2.0 |
0.0 | Trust10% | ▲4.0 |
2.0 | Consumer Experience5% | ▲5.0 |
Key facts
| ONNIT | Fact | NooCube |
|---|---|---|
| — | Extraction method | unspecified |
| — | Mushroom source | unspecified |
| — | Beta-glucan % | — |
| Not disclosed | Beta-glucan verified | Not disclosed |
| Not disclosed | COA available | Not disclosed |
| Not disclosed | Organic certified | Not disclosed |
| — | Trustpilot score | 4.1 (3100 reviews) |
| — | Price per serving | £2.17 |
ONNIT vs NooCube: questions answered
Which discloses more, ONNIT or NooCube?+
ONNIT scores 0.45/10 and NooCube scores 1.44/10 on the Cogniscore disclosure rating. NooCube discloses more overall. The rating reflects what each brand publishes about ingredient sourcing, beta-glucan content, extraction method, dose adequacy and third-party testing. It is not a verdict on product quality or safety.
How are the ONNIT and NooCube scores calculated?+
Cogniscore rates supplements across five dimensions: ingredient quality (35%), transparency (30%), value for money (20%), trust and third-party testing (10%), and consumer experience (5%). Every score comes from publicly available information, applying the rules in the published methodology. A score measures how much a brand discloses, not whether a product works.
Are ONNIT and NooCube the same type of product?+
Both are scored in the Nootropic Blend category, which is why they are compared side by side. Cogniscore only compares products within a category, so the dimensions mean the same thing for each.